“Death Do Us
Part” is a ghost story for the weary in January. Why don’t people tell ghost
stories in January and October? January’s the most ghastly month of the twelve.
It is gray, cold, and almost apocalyptic looking. Everything is dead; it is the
‘dead of winter’. I felt more drawn to ghost stories in the last seven days. I
re-read Vladimir Nabokov’s remarkable ghostly short story, “The Vane Sisters.”
I ordered Henry James’ ghost story, titled “The Turn of the Screw.” “Death Do
Us Part” introduced three ghost seekers, who find ghostly goings on in an
abandoned house where a married couple were brutally murdered five years ago.
The most passionate ghost seeker dies the same death as the couple. The Wesen
(it’s not a ghost) electrocutes the ghost seeker to death and he also crushes
his skull. Nick, Hank, and Wu investigate who and why it happened. It’s not a
ghost, so, then, it’s Wesen. It’s always Wesen.
Grimm, because
of its creators, reminds one of the great WB series, ANGEL, mixed with a rote
police procedural. The beginning of the episode seemed inspired by early
X-Files. The two living ghost seekers found their friend burned to death, his
skull crushed, and the woman, Carol, screams. Mark Snow’s iconic theme song
seemed bound to follow. Grimm’s much different from the X-Files. The characters
don’t clash over belief and empiricism. Either the character knows or the
character doesn’t. The nifty teaser leads to a traditional Grimm
case-of-the-week episode, with a side of Juliette trying to tame her hexenbiest.
Oh well.
The
case-of-the-week follows the beats of a procedural mystery. A former Portland
police officer who worked the original couple murder drops helpful clues: the
bodies were never identified, and the suspected killer was never caught. Nick,
Hank, and Wu interview the wife of the suspected killer, now missing, and soon
learn that the suspected killer was the lover and died that night, and the
suspected dead husband is the killer. The ghostly apparitions have a cool,
creepy, haunting quality. The dead wife smiles teasingly and seductively at her
husband. He’s now more insane and bearded. Stetson, the name of the
aforementioned husband, watched in horror as the ghosts of his dead lover and
dead friend dance and romance. It combines Wesen murderer with a tropey ghost
love story. The best part of the story was the explosive end. The tertiary wife
character of the dead friend shoots Stetson dead. Stetson’s death released the
electricity. A wave of light and electrostatic energy blew out the upstairs of
the haunted house. One of the living ghost seekers filmed Stetson’s electric
Wesen transformation and uploads it to the internet. The explosive denouement
to the episode will not ripple into other episodes though. Hank asks Renard
about the ramifications of the video for the case. Renard shakes his head and
says, “No one believes in ghosts.”
No, no one
believes in ghosts. Nick learned new facts about a new wesen. The trick to
beating Stetson is Nick piercing his ear and rubbing paste into the hole to prevent
the electricity from killing him. Carol watched Nick and Hank do the ear
piercing and paste rubbing. She wonders what kind of cops they are, which
continues the loose cop vs. wesen theme that seems likely to crescendo in the
warmer spring months.
The theme of
poor communication and knowledge continued for Juliette and Nick. The theme of
knowledge and one’s lack of it is a character wide theme, not specific to a
character. Juliette uses Renard to help her control her hexenbiest side. Nick
notices oddities. Juliette used the trailer for hexenbiest research, but he
disregards it as a follow-up to their her-as-Adalind healing thing with him.
Rosalee asked about Juliette’s headaches. Nick stood dumbly by, as if he
couldn’t decide between cocoa puffs and cocoa pebbles. Secrecy and horrible
communication between characters in love seems a constant in Grimm. Those
things don’t raise the dramatic stakes. The constant lack of communication
between characters becomes tiresome four seasons in. It works for short stretches
in the storytelling but when it keeps up season after season, it reflects
poorly on the writers. TV writers will hit the same tropes, plot devices,
narrative tricks over seasons, but mystery and obfuscation wears out.
“Death Do Us
Part” is not without surprises. Renard sees his three bullet wounds re-bleed.
Juliette meets a mysterious woman that knows about hexenbiests. That’s it for
the surprises.
Other Thoughts:
-No more scenes
of Wu’s late night fast food/wesen book binges. The callback to Wu’s carpet
eating days was great. I watched part of a middle season 1 episode when Wu
began eating bugs (episode 16, I think. Find the review in the archives). I’ll
miss Wu eating horrible shit.
-Whenever I
visit Portland, I’d like to visit that remote house. I want to visit Ogden,
Utah because of Everwood. I want to visit Wilmington, North Carolina to
re-create Dawson’s Creek. Yes.
-I mentioned two
ghost stories I re-read/will read. The former is Nabokov’s “The Vane Sisters”,
originally published in The New Yorker:
http://lavachequilit.typepad.com/files/the-vane-sisters.pdf.
The latter is Henry James’ “The Turn of the Screw”- http://www.gutenberg.org/files/209/209-h/209-h.htm
(it’s longer than “The Vane Sisters”). I also podcasted about “Ghosts”. I don't have a direct link for "Ghosts". The url for the podcast is speakon.castmate.fm.
-Constantine
Makris directed the episode. Jeff Miller wrote the episode (his first writing
credit).