Friday, March 31, 2017

Grimm "The End" Review

I figured out “The End” about a one-third of the way through the episode. At a certain point, killing off characters loses the ‘shock and awe’ quality, and one wonders what’s going on. Major characters died every few minutes in “The End”, a fun trend that started at the end of last week’s penultimate episode. Once Renard took Zerstorer’s rod through the heart in defense of his suddenly pro-Zerstorer daughter, I started thinking about where it’d all lead. It didn’t take long for my Eureka moment. The writers made sure to emphasize the fact that two realities exist concurrently; thus, Nick was in the Bad Reality.

David Greenwalt did the whole ‘kill off nearly every major character’ before when he worked for Joss Whedon on Buffy, the Vampire Slayer. Greenwalt directed episode nine of Buffy’s third season when a wish demon grants Cordelia her wish by making a world in which Buffy never came to Sunnydale. A Sunnydale without Buffy is a bad Sunnydale. One of the iconic scenes in Buffy belongs to the end of “The Wish” when Buffy, Xander, Willow, and Angel die. (When Angel die, Buffy didn’t even wince, because her and Angel never met and fell in epic love in this bad wish reality). If Nick hadn’t been in The Other Place, I expected Zerstorer’s Rod to do its thing and resurrect everything.

Anyway, the series finale of Grimm highlighted two major things, both Nick related. Nick, like Buffy Summers, would be nothing without his friends. Losing his friends nearly motivated him to give Zerstorer the stick. Also, the Grimm line is strong, like the line of Slayer blood that united every slayer from the First to Buffy to…well, I won’t give away the ending to Buffy. Zerstorer’s most deadly power wasn’t the Rod, though its power neared ultimate—it was his ability to manipulate reality and to take away the people Nick loved the most, a loss so great he would’ve sacrificed the whole of humanity to bring them back. (And that’s another echo of ANGEL, though Greenwalt wasn’t involved in the fifth season or the specific fifth season episode “A Hole in the World”).

Trubel saved him from himself, and his mother and Aunt Marie provided him strength when he needed it most. Isn’t that what we, too, hope for in our lowest moments: the strength of love, fellowship, and family bonds to help us fight what we think we cannot defeat? I loved the shot of Nick, Kelly, Aunt Marie, and Trubel surrounding Zerstorer in The Other Place. That’s an image for a final Grimm poster—specifically the overhead shot of Zerstorer standing tall as four Grimms surround him (or three. Was Aunt Marie a confirmed Grimm).

A part of me felt bummed during the episode because of the quick deaths to the other major characters, because I wanted more impactful involvement from them. Of course, such a perspective is, ultimately, selfish and skewed. Characters don’t need to be active physical presences in someone’s specific story for them to be impactful. Let us not forget that Grimm was Nick’s story. David Greenwalt and Jim Kouf wanted to finish Nick’s story in “The End”.

Grimm began with Nick on his own (aside from Monroe). No one knew, not Hank, not Wu, not Juliette, and Rosalee wouldn’t enter his and Monroe’s life for another season. Like other supernatural genre shows, Grimm began as a show of discovery. Nick discovered a new life and a new world and began the hero’s journey. Aunt Marie called him to adventure. He refused the call, found a mentor in his Aunt and a guide in Monroe, and then he crossed the threshold when he saved the little girl in the “Pilot” and faced off with his first Wesen as a Grimm. He returned to his home, having changed. The hero’s journey repeated throughout the six seasons until “The End” when it reached its synthesis, and the writers switched from the monomyth to the Hegelian triad where Grimm then spiraled into a new thesis, twenty years later, with Kelly and Diana helping their Mom and Dad fight Wesen alongside the triplets and Monroe and Rosalee.

Now, did Grimm need to tell a trippy fever dream Other Place story over the span of three episodes? Sure. Why not? Grimm was a trippy, weird, crazy, fever dream of a show. This show dropped plotlines and characters without abandon. The writers wrote off major overarching stories with one line. I had no idea where everything in Grimm’s history would lead to in the end. I learned to go along with Grimm’s battiness after awhile. It turned out that Grimm returned to its roots to the end. The end of stories often return to its beginning in some ways. The hero in the monomyth returns home transformed, like Frodo at the end of The Lord of the Rings. Finnegans Wake “brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs” at the end, which is the beginning.

Nick returns to his home where his friends are, all of them, Hank, Monroe, Rosalee, Wu, Eve, Renard, and his lover, Adalind, where he’s stronger with them and because of them. Yes, every series on television resurrects characters now. Death doesn’t mean a thing, but it doesn’t always need to mean finality on television. Sure, it’d be nice if it did, sometimes. We get plenty of death’s finality in our lives, though. I wanted to see Nick and his friends together in the end somehow. I even liked the group hug. So, yeah, I’m a softie.

Grimm is over now. I wrote three weeks ago in my final post for The Vampire Diaries that ending a story is incredibly difficult. It is. A writer, or writers, can’t satisfy every fan in the world. Someone, somewhere, will feel disappointed. That’s unavoidable. It’s often to best to think about the whole of the story you experienced after it ends, whether it’s a book, a TV show, a movie, a podcast, or a music album, and consider whether or not you felt glad you watched and experienced it. Maybe you’ll think of it in terms of worth. Was it worth the time you invested in it? I’m sorry if you thought it wasn’t. I hope it was for you.

Other Thoughts:

-Grimm was the weirdest show I wrote about, I’d say. One wouldn’t think it was weird. It’s a supernatural procedural about fighting creatures from fairy tales, right? Well, it began so simply. Little things about Grimm threw me: the structure of some episodes, for example, or the pacing, or the treatment of exposition, dialogue choices—not to mention some arcs as well as other things I’ve rambled about in past reviews.

-My thanks to Grimm’s delightful cast for great work over the years and to Grimm’s crew, writers, and many directors. Not many folks thought Grimm would make it to thirteen episodes in the late summer and early fall of 2011. I offer my additional thanks to all for giving me something to write about for the last six years. Grimm joins Everwood as the only shows I wrote about in toto.


-Jim Kouf & David Greenwalt wrote the finale. David Greenwalt directed.

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Grimm "Zerstörer Shrugged" Review

I’ve always found writing about the first part of a two part Grimm story difficult because the first part is all set up. The Big Bad wastes time killing nameless extras. The good guys spend time figuring out what’s going on, developing plans of attack and defense, and zeroing in on what the Big Bad really wants.

Two-parters at the end of a season or the end of a series often raise the stakes at the  end of the first part. Buffy stabbed Faith at the end of “Graduation Day, Part 1”. Holtz had Justine kill him to make it look like Angel, Connor’s father, did it in “Benediction”. The episode that comes to my mind, though, is “The Candidate” from LOST’s final season. No, “The Candidate” isn’t the penultimate episode, but “Zerstorer Shrugged” has in common with it a devastating ending, an ending that shows anything can and will happen at the end, and an ending that raises the stakes for “The End”.

“Zerstorer Shrugged” isn’t without challenges, particularly its role in the Grimm universe. The symbols pointed to a fatidic event weeks ago, which was the 24th of March. Rosalee, Eve, and Monroe consulted a number of books between this episode and last week’s episode. In each book they found new pieces that helped them solve the puzzle of Zerstorer, his rod, and the stick. Their scenes reminded me of Doc Jensen’s LOST recaps in which he found a text relevant to LOST and would then develop a fun, thought-provoking theory/interpretation of that week’s episode, which is essentially what Monroe engages in throughout “Zerstorer Shrugged”. While that type of investigation may provide its inquirer with the broad strokes of a grand plan, it cannot anticipate the details, i.e. who will die and who won’t.

All the books, the research, the symbols, and the history works to make this ending the natural, fatidic ending for Grimm, and to make all Grimm’s disparate parts make sense. The effort is similar to “Inside Out” from ANGEL’s fourth season. “Inside Out” tried telling the audience how everything that happened in the show happened to bring about Jasmine. It’s fun for the audience and the writers to think that it all mattered, but it’s not necessary.

The research of Monroe, Rosalee, and Eve uncovered a vital piece of information when they deduced that the stick belongs to the rod. The Crusaders buried it precisely to keep Zerstorer, aka The Fallen Angel, aka The Devil, from finding it for his rod. Zerstorer’s rod, see, was assembled from pieces scattered across the world. As long as he doesn’t get the last piece, which is the stick, the gang has a chance. And, obviously, if they break his rod, they’ll break him.

So, “Zerstorer Shrugged” hums along as the gang researches more. Adalind and Renard hid with Diana and Kelly in the cabin in the woods where Nick saved a little girl years ago (another instance of Greenwalt and Kouf trying to circle around to beginning at the end. How Viconian.). Nick and Eve couldn’t beat Zerstorer. Diana, because she’s all plot device, without explanation, opened the portal, which Zerstorer used to crossover. Zerstorer became a handsome muscular blonde man on planet Earth, of course, killed some folk, and then he killed Hank and Wu. Son of a gun, Kouf and Greenwalt. The deaths worked spectacularly well, I thought. Losing Wu and Hank hurts, and it shows that no one else is safe in the series finale. I totally didn’t expect to lose both characters in the span of several seconds. Last week’s episode suggested that Eve would die. Characters don’t have honest conversations with each other unless something terrible will happen afterwards. As the returning Trubel followed Zerstorer, I thought that, “Oh, she’s back to die,” but then Hank and Wu died.

Pretty nifty, Grimm.

Other Thoughts:

-I loved Wu and Hank, but they were the most disposable characters. Still, I expected a Buffy ending with our heroes standing together after defeating an ultimate, first evil. Neither character had much of a personal arc throughout the series. Hank was always Nick’s partner for the murder investigations. Hank didn’t learn about Nick or wesen for nearly two years. Maybe it was only a season. Wu didn’t find out for three seasons, was it? Wu had some of the show’s best sub-arcs, though. When the writers found something for Hank besides murder investigations, it was a doomed love affair. Russell Hornsby and Reggie Lee were great. Maybe we’ll see them again in the finale. Many showrunners cannot resist reuniting characters in some kind of afterlife these days. Thanks a lot, Alan Ball.

-You can't a Big Bad named the Destroyer and not have him destroy characters we love.

-Nick, Renard, and Adalind strolled down Nostalgia Lane and remembered the time when Adalind worked for the Royals. She used to be a major badass.

-Trubel told Nick that every Black Claw cell was destroyed. That’s the Grimm I know: ending a major storyline off-screen. Black Claw used to be portrayed as the ultimate challenge for Nick and his friends. Obviously, season six being the last changed things. I have no idea, of course. I’m a lowly blogger.

-Brenna Kouf wrote the episode. Jim Kouf and David Greenwalt got the story credit. Aaron Lipstadt, a veteran Grimm director, directed the episode.


-Be here next week for “The End”!

Friday, March 17, 2017

Grimm "Where The Wild Things Were" Review

Were the wild things in Pylea?

Grimm returned to a favorite old standby in “Where The Wild Things Were”.  You know the one. Characters stand around and tell another character various things that the audience watched happen throughout the season. One could argue that the scenes between the gang and Renard existed this time specifically because of Renard’s past duplicity. Would the gang, as well as the audience, trust him? Could he earn that trust? Renard has been feeble and passive since “Oh Captain My Captain” so he seemed sort of eager to help the gang save Nick and Eve from The Other Place. Plus, his daughter is the destined bride of the devil. That’ll make someone put aside old grudges.

This episode set things up for Grimm’s endgame. Amazingly, Kouf and Greenwalt seem committed to tying this wacky and insane world together via The Other Place, Zerstorer, the stick, the cloth, the symbols, and the keys. The Other Place is clearly The Black Forest circa 1204—the time of the stick, the cloth, and the keys. The world then was full of wesen in their pre-woge nature. Zerstorer, the devil, is a creature the resident humans would like dead. Nick proved his killer aptitude by shooting dead a few Blutbaden. The villagers eagerly pointed Nick in the direction of Zerstorer.

All of “Where The Wild Things Were” anticipates Zerstorer’s appearance in The Other Place. Essentially, nothing much happens besides characters repeating information and plot details that the audience already knows. At Nick’s loft, the other characters imply or suggest things that likely will figure into the next two episodes.

The one significant character scene belonged to Nick and Eve wherein the writing finally addressed the divide between Juliette and Eve. Nick’s history with Juliette motivated his stepping through the looking glass to help her, but Eve emphasized that she’s not Juliette, that Juliette’s gone, while confirming that she remembers and “hates” what Juliette did. That will allow Nick to find a measure of closure about what happened at the end of season four without the writers pulling an about-face and admitting that they created Eve specifically to rehabilitate Juliette. The scene’s notable for clearing away any confusion about Eve’s characterization since season five’s finale yet the thin threads that remains between Juliette and Eve marred the scene.

The writing last season never addressed what happened at the end of season four. Instead, the writers introduced Eve, gave her a wig, had different characters repeat that she was a different character, even though it seemed like an overt attempt to rehab the character by giving her a different identity. Anyway, that’s evidently not the case. Beyond the confusion, messiness, and problems of Eve’s existence, the scene sneaked in a relatable real life thing about two people growing apart and becoming different people in the Nick/Juliette scene. People change throughout a relationship, except in Grimm the change is noticeable. Nick became a Grimm. Juliette became a hexenbiest. Genre shows such as Grimm and that other fairy tale show on ABC, and the many genre shows before both fairy tale shows, used larger-than-life metaphors to tell stories about the everyday. Grimm is such a loose, weird, and discombobulated show at times that one (i.e. me) overlooks how this or that thing in Grimm mythos informs something about a character or a relationship. Of course, Grimm’s writers never seemed to start breaking a story by asking how this or that thing will inform or highlight a character or his or relationship.

Sometimes Grimm got lost in the weeds.

Other Thoughts:

-Nevertheless, I liked seeing Renard interacting with the rest of the cast. The initial reluctance by Monroe, Rosalee, Adalind, Hank, and Wu to share crucial information with Renard quickly disappeared, and everyone freely shared each detail involving The Other Place.

-This episode's quote came from Shakespeare's The Tempest, one of my favorite Shakespeare plays. The Tempest and "Where The Wild Things Were" had altering realities in common. Check out the audio dramatization of the play starring Sir Ian McKellen as Prospero if you can.

-Wu had a line about Alice in Wonderland tonight. Did you know Vladimir Nabokov translated that book into Russian in his early 20s? There was a time in 2014 when I drew parallels between Adalind's adventures in Viktor's castle and Nabokov's Invitation to a Beheading. Ah, memories. Anyway, the obvious 'through the looking glass' metaphor connects Grimm and ANGEL yet again. One of ANGEL's season two Pylean episodes is titled "Through The Looking Glass". 


-->
-Brenna Kouf wrote the episode. Terrence O’Hara directed.

Saturday, March 11, 2017

Grimm "Blood Magic" Review

The old and elderly don’t have any presence on primetime television. Norman Lear, the legendary sitcom creator and writer, has tried to find a place for his series about life in a retirement village, titled Guess Who Died? Lear told the press in January 2016 that TV writers relegate older characters to marginal roles, either “eccentric neighbors or wise-cracking grandparents”. Their problems, plights, and pains remain invisible to TV audiences. Network executives think that young people only want to watch young people, and I think that’s wrong assumption.

I never expected an episode of Grimm named “Blood Magic” would end up telling a poignant story about aging, dementia, and dignity in dying and, thereby, making an aspect of older life more visible for the viewing public. I hope Norman Lear has a chance to watch it. Whereas “Tree People” served a pro-environmentalism and pro-conservation message, “Blood Magic” tries on, however slightly, the controversial issue of Right to Die. The Right to Die issue is complex, complicated, and better served when different individuals (politicians, law makers, doctors, patients, etc) sit down together in a room to whether or not someone who is suffering has the right to choose when he or she dies. The Wesen community leaves the choice to the family. Rosalee expects Nick and Hank to think it a ‘callous’ in an instance of the writers possibly anticipating some sort of backlash from viewers for portraying the issue in a humane and merciful light.

Norman Lear’s “Guess Who Died?” would make the issue a conversation between his characters. That’s the Norman Lear way. Grimm isn’t the type of show in which characters would pause the action to discuss the issue. Ultimately, Nick makes the decision that Mr. Stanton would needlessly suffer in prison for murders he didn’t know he committed, so the Wesen community’s Godfather of Death humanely ends the man’s life along with his sufferings. The scene in which Mr. Stanton dies brought tears to my eyes (partially brought on by Bree Turner’s acting). No, I never, ever expected Grimm to tell a humane, poignant story about dementia and dying with dignity.

The plot leading to the moving scene at the Stantons involves the problem of older Wesens who can’t control when they woged and attacked. The 91 year old woman who dies earlier in the episode tells an orderly helping her that she remembers running and the taste of blood in her mouth. When she shortly woges, Mason, the orderly, acts in self-defense. Nick and Hank must prove Mason’s innocence without implicating Dr. Lando, the Godfather of Death, who also acts as the attending physician at the elderly home, because of Rosalee’s and Monroe’s insistence that Nick not remove Lando from the community. It’s their way of protecting Wesen. Nick can’t interfere.

I liked that the writers continue to add to the Wesen world so late in the series. Each addition to it makes it more of a fluid, independent world. Nick as the Grimm sees what may be a tiny part of their existence. He faces the murderous, criminal part, and it’s a shame Grimm didn’t explore other areas earlier in the series.

“Blood Magic” also dealt more with the mirror world, its connection to blood magic, the symbols in the tunnel, and Renard’s growing curiosity about said symbols and its connection with his daughter. Renard and Nick spoke for the first time in “Oh Captain My Captain” about the symbols and the tunnel. Nick told him to “share what he knows”. No tunnel access for him. Juliette is off on her own researching. Adalind can’t help her much, or she could but she would rather protect Juliette from what awaits her in the mirror. Man, what a sentence. This show is silly.

Other Thoughts:

-Why don’t writers’ rooms institute a rule for characters saying “I don’t want to talk to character x until I have y figured out”? Nick said it this season. Juliette said it. The line sucks. It’s lazy writing. Don’t do it.

-Thomas Ian Griffith wrote the episode. Janice Cooke directed it. She directed the third season Dawson’s Creek episode “Cinderella Story”. That was the first episode she directed in her career. I would ask her so many questions about that experience if I could.

Friday, March 10, 2017

The Vampire Diaries "I Was Feeling Epic" Review

In 2009, The Vampire Diaries premiered with an episode about death and loss. Elena Gilbert, our heroine, lost her foundation when her mother and her father died a car crash. How else to end a series about death and loss than with a reunion between you and the people you loved the most but lost too soon in your life?

So much of The Vampire Diaries revolved around the love triangle between Stefan, Elena, and Damon. The marketing revolved around it. Fans united and divided over it. Of course, I always thought the love triangle was beside the point of the series. Sure, that love triangle was and is a large part of the show’s identity. A supernatural soap needs the melodrama only a love triangle can provide. Aside from the triangle, I focused on the relationship between the two brothers, Stefan and Damon. They were the show’s truest love story for me. Love means more than romantic. Brotherly, familial, and filial love were also cornerstones of the series. If you want to call it a love story, don’t limit it to the love story of Stefan, Elena, and Damon.

The one thing TVD consistently excelled at throughout the series was the experience of saying goodbye to someone you loved. Remember the end of “Memorial” or when Caroline experiences the death of her mother and father or Stefan losing his best friend or Elena losing her aunt? Somehow, this show with an awful title could understand death, saying goodbye, and the precariousness of the phrase ‘moving on’. Yes, while people continue with their lives after someone they love dies, no one ever moves on. Moving on is impossible. We silently carry our losses with us throughout our lives. You may never know it, but we do. And the final act of this crazy show got that. Elena and Damon live their natural human lives together, carrying with them all the while the people they lost along their hopes that they’ll see them again.

So, what happens? Elena sees her mother and father again, her Aunt Jenna, and her Uncle John when she dies, at the home she burned down once in one of her worst moment when she couldn’t bear to feel the loss of her brother because once he’s gone they’re all gone and that’s unbearable for her, a living hell. And Damon returned to the Salvatore mansion to see his brother again, and they embraced for the first time in a long time as the show went white, the symbol of peaceful afterlife. Isn’t that the best we can hope for when our own respective lives die? I thought it was lovely and a flawless way to end the stories of Elena, Stefan, and Damon.

The rest of “I Was Feeling Epic” had the same problems that the past seasons had. Plec and Williamson repeated a lot of the beats in “It’s Been a Hell of a Ride”. The brothers fought over who will do the martyr job, the gang had to destroy the devil and hell, except this time Bonnie used her psychic mojo combined with the massive energy of hellfire to destroy hell and Katherine forever. That was disappointing, especially when it seemed that “It’s Been a Hell of a Ride” concluded the season eight nonsense. Of course, Katherine clarified that she had controlled Cade throughout the season. She made Cade bother with the brothers through the Sirens. So, Katherine’s last evil act wasn’t the hellfire stuff; it was inflicting the Sirens on us.

For all the end-of-the-world stakes, it was surprisingly minimalist. Much of the episode takes place over a period of forty-five minutes until the epilogue. Plec and Williamson pick and chose their moments, so there’s a great Bennett gathering to destroy hell, the reconciliation of the Maxwell/Donovan family, and the Elena/Stefan scene in the school, but “I Was Feeling Epic” didn’t have Alaric and Damon interact at all or a final scene for Damon and Bonnie. Alaric only says that he cares about Elena and Damon, but, come on, Damon and Alaric were bros for so much of the series until the writers chose to disrupt it in season seven because they were creatively spent and needed new avenues for drama. In sum, the finale had some curious creative choices.

The last act of the series combined Six Feet Under, Titanic, and The Return of the King, didn’t it? Elena’s awakening, with Bonnie by her side, reminded me of Frodo waking up as Gandalf stands there, a miraculous sight for Frodo because he didn’t know that Gandalf had been restored to life. They start laughing. Sam comes in. Merry and Pippin enter. Soon, everyone’s laughing, and then Frodo’s off to the eternal Grey Havens. It all feels a little rushed, especially when you remember how the writers misused a lot of their time this season, but I really liked the way old characters, in a slight Titanic homage, appeared in cameo: Jeremy helping Alaric and Caroline with the school; Vicky and Tyler together; the aforementioned Gilberts; Jo watching her family; Liz beside her daughter at the school; and, especially, Lexi meeting Stefan after he died.

It is hard to end a series, though. People really count on endings to make it the investment feel worthwhile. It shouldn’t. Endings are important, yes, but so, too, is the experience of watching something week-to-week or reading something, and if you enjoyed most of it, then it was worth it, because it helped you feel happy, but, I repeat, it’s really hard to end a series in a satisfying way for each individual fan, especially The Vampire Diaries. This show should’ve ended years ago. It lasted beyond its natural duration, and it showed. The last two seasons were terrible and removed from what made the show so good in seasons two and three. Some fans won’t like who Elena ended up with or who died or this and that. But even with the numerous problems of the show’s last two seasons and the various creative struggles the writers experienced since the start of season five, Julie Plec and Kevin Williamson wrote a great ending.

Other Thoughts:

-I watched the “Forever Yours” special. Julie Plec essentially gave away the finale. She telegraphed everything.

-Some quibbles with the Stefan and Elena scene: I didn’t like Stefan explaining everything he did to save Damon. Imagine the rush of the fans when they realize that he gave Damon the cure to save him from being damned to an eternity without the two people most important to him. Also, I would’ve liked their one scene together to be about Stefan and Elena. Those two were the best together in the early seasons.

-I understand why Julie and Kevin brought back the diary narration at the end. It served a purpose for quick resolutions to various stories, but I wish they found another way to do it.  A minor quibble.

-I guess we’ll see Caroline in New Orleans to thank Klaus for his generation donation to the school she and Alaric started. Dorian, amazingly, survived the season and the series. Good for Dorian. Poor Georgia.

-Bonnie saved the world. She rewarded herself with a trip around the world. Not bad.

-I started watching The Vampire Diaries during summer 2010 after reading that, despite the title, it was a good, fun genre show. Seven years later, here I am. When TVD was good, it was great fun; when it wasn't good, it was bad and like a slog. Writing about a show weekly for seven years was an interesting experience, one I likely will not repeat. I'm not sure whether I sort of regret writing over 140 posts about this show or not. I did bond with love interests over this show years ago. I don't know whether that counts for much now. Probably not. Those didn't go anywhere. It'd be a better story if I could write, "This show brought me and my wife together", wouldn't it? Okay, maybe it wouldn't be a good story, but it'd be a story. But it didn't. It's only me and these...reviews. (I'm writing this with my comedy in my heart and in the spirit of light-hearted self-deprecation.) They're off and married now, I think, or I know. I wonder if they watched the finale.

-Anyway, I'm grateful to Julie Plec, Caroline Dries, Bryan Young, Kevin Williamson, and all the other writers throughout the years who wrote for this show for giving me something to write about every week. I started this blog in 2010 (well, really, in 2009 on a different site with a different name) primarily as a way for me to continue writing consistently. Writing this blog helped me do that. There's nearly 1300 posts in the archive about all sorts of TV.

-Thank you to anyone who ever read any of my TVD posts in the past. There were some great times when hundreds of people read my posts, and there were some lean times when not a lot of people read my posts. Thank you to one of my friends for retweeting my posts over the years despite never watching a single episode. I appreciated every little thing that came this blog’s way.


-Finally, as always, I end with the credits. Julie Plec & Kevin Williamson wrote the episode. Julie Plec, of course, directed it.

About The Foot

My photo
Originally, I titled the blog Jacob's Foot after the giant foot that Jacob inhabited in LOST. That ended. It became TV With The Foot in 2010. I wrote about a lot of TV.